Panjabi Section |   Download Panjabi Font |   Author  |  Founder  |  Contact  |  Feedback

  Current Issues  
  Religio Politics  
  My India!  

Welcome to the Sikh Vichar Manch-Thought Provoking Forum for Justice


Why Do Judges Commit Arbitrariness and Lawlessness? 


The Concept of ‘Philosopher King’ Being Taught and Interpreted Wrongly 

Bureaucrats and Judicial officials feel Above the Constitution of India;

Why? To Commit Arbitrariness and Lawlessness
In Connivance with the Politicians in Power in India

First, the great thinker Plato thought sincerely and honestly to replace the ‘Law’ with the ‘Philosopher King’ to run the system and after independence of India, the majority rule to establish the rule of arbitrariness and lawlessness against the rule of law started undermining law i.e. the Constitution of India, directly and indirectly through media and by other means. 

Public started following innocently and blindly, the wrongly projected concept that ‘Law is Blind’. 

Now after the ‘The Babri Masjid Title Suit Verdict, the situation has reached such an impasse that secular minded Hindus, Muslims and others feel that further appeal to Supreme Court is inevitable after noticing the extremity of arbitrariness and lawlessness in this case! The politicians were and are misusing faith and beliefs and exploiting the masses under the wrong vote catching system by undermining the law i.e. the Constitution of India from the very beginning in India. 

In fact, the concept of ‘Philosopher King’ invented by Plato seems being taught and interpreted wrongly to new recruits, bureaucrats and judicial officials during their training with malafide intention in order to ignore the system, supposed to be based on law to avoid arbitrariness and lawlessness in the system. Such wrongly imparted education to the new recruits provided upper hand to the illiterate politicians in the long run to dictate their terms to bureaucracy and judiciary in India.  

The bureaucracy and the judiciary for their convenience i.e. knowingly or unknowingly followed the system of arbitrariness and lawlessness in connivance with the politicians in power in India.  

Under the circumstances, the Constitution of India looks as a waste paper or it helps to encourage the system of arbitrariness and lawlessness. ‘An Indian’ very reasonably and rightly commented saying, “If, and that's a BIG "IF" Allahabad High Court Verdict stands, then, it will become law- Giving PRECEDENCE if Verdict Stands……… !!! 

Giving PRECEDENCE if Verdict Stands !!!

I quote,

“If, and that's a BIG "IF" Allahabad High Court Verdict i.r.o. Babri Masjid stands valid - in future, I could MAKE a DHARNA at anyone's PROPERTY, vacate the owner ILLEGALLY; occupy it for a period. Then, I can go to court - claiming that my great great great forefather was a "saint", and he was born on this property; so it should be GIVEN to ME - "legally", "based on my faith / belief", and in light of Allahabad High Court Verdict.

I believe, no court in India can LEGALLY DENY my claim. As far as I can view / discern, this is LEGALLY possible OUTCOME of my future claim, if I wish to make - UNLESS the honourable court AGAIN wishes to do INJUSTICE.

I leave it to TCN readers, especially the learned Advocate - Mr. Balbir Singh Soonch, Ludhiana - Punjab TO CORRECT my "layman 's" view / understanding of the LEARNED JUSTICES verdict.” Quarterly.
As I religiously browsed through Sardar Balbir Singh Sooch's remarkable thesis “Why India is devoid of Rule of Law?” I could not help reacting in the ... -

Balbir Singh Sooch, Advocate, Ludhiana
Chief and Spokesperson, Sikh Vichar Manch!/profile.php?id=100000753376567


 The Impact of Rationality of the Sikh Vichar Manch

Ayodhya Verdict: A lesson for the coming generation

And Much More…….. 

Muslim bodies urged to join Babri legal fight 

Points at Glance: 

  1. “All prominent Muslim organisations, religious denominations, religious seminaries and the Babri Masjid Movement” to intervene in the appeal to be filed on behalf of Muslims in the Supreme Court against the Ayodhya title suits judgment.


  1. The “lawyers, historians, and archaeologists besides civil society and other progressive and secular groups” also invited to join in the effort to challenge the judgment in the interest of upholding constitutional and judicial principles.


  1. The Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind (JUH) said nobody had the authority to gift away a mosque that been built according to the principles of sharia. “No forceful or coercive occupation can change the status of a mosque. Therefore Muslims can never give up their claim to any part of the mosque which has been used as a mosque uninterruptedly for the last 400.


  1. Now, question arises whether the Supreme of India in face of the negative attitude of RSS-BJP and the Congress towards Muslims and the minorities in general, for the political reasons, will uphold the constitutional and judicial principles?


  1. Will the Supreme of India answer to the question in appeals to be filed?


Balbir Singh Sooch, Advocate, Ludhiana
Chief and Spokesperson, Sikh Vichar Manch!/profile.php?id=100000753376567


Ayodhya: Negotiated settlement the best option
Brahmanism versus Human Rights

RSS Root Cause of Violence and Terrorism in

By Balbir Singh Sooch, Advocate, Ludhiana

Cry for Justice
Human Rights
  All Headlines  
Index  |  Home  |  Panjabi Section  |  Author  |  Founder  |  Feedback  |  Links

Copyright © Balbir Singh Sooch, Chief and Spokesperson, Sikh Vichar Manch, Ludhana, Punjab (India)