Panjabi Section |   Download Panjabi Font |   Author  |  Founder  |  Contact  |  Feedback

 
     
     
  Index  
     
  Home  
     
  Current Issues  
     
  Religio Politics  
     
  General  
     
  My India!  
     
  Personalities  
 

Welcome to the Sikh Vichar Manch-Thought Provoking Forum for Justice

 
 

 
The U.N. vote on the death penalty
http://www.hindu.com/2007/12/21/stories/2007122155431100.htm 

SUBMISSION BY SIKH VICHAR MANCH 

The United Nations General Assembly rightly observed that “the death penalty must always be regarded as an extreme exception to the fundamental right to life — which is protected under international law”. Moreover, it is awarded normally for the political reasons ignoring the social as well as the manipulated factors for the crime to involve the selected accused innocently by the vested forces for their selfish reasons purposely in developing countries like India. 

Here, I like to quote as an example of awarding the death penalty to BALWANT SINGH along with JAGTAR SINGH HAWARA who are now like a useless and spent force for the agencies and the other vested forces who might have actively manipulated the crime in face of the political, social and the other factors given in the ‘National Policy and Strategy’ openly disclosed by former DGP Punjab K.P.S. GILL.

And without detecting the reasons and the factors behind the domestic and international terrorist incidents then in the given circumstances, the execution of the death penalty to BALWANT SINGH along with JAGTAR SINGH HAWARA shall be a black spot forever on the international community, out to abolish the death penalty.  

Then DGP of Punjab, K.P.S. GILL is very eagerly demanding setting up of ‘A Constitutional Commission’ to bring forward the categories of terrorists and the officers in all branches of government and administration involved in the inhuman ‘National Policy and Strategy’. First, they must be identified to clear the whole picture by the ‘Constitutional Commission’ for facing justice, he said. 

Please do refer the text of letter:
http://www.sikhvicharmanch.com/Cry%20for%20justice-Who%20will%20answer%20inquire%20and%20punish%20for%20the%20people.htm 

http://www.satp.org/satporgtp/kpsgill/terrorism/97PM.htm
Text of K.P.S. Gill's letter to Prime Minister I.K. Gujral on the death of
Ajit Singh Sandhu

Former DGP Punjab K.P.S. GILL clearly says that no government shall agree and allow coming out truth about the strategy of State Terrorism when interviewed as under: Please click to read:

http://www.tribuneindia.com/2007/20070916/punjab1.htm#20

Former DGP Punjab K.P.S. Gill admitted that such a commission might not suit any government, however, the people of Punjab deserve to know what was the truth, who fanned the militancy and how terrorism was brought “under control”.

Under the circumstances, the awarding of death penalty to BALWANT SINGH along with JAGTAR SINGH HAWARA is totally illegal for the political reasons ignoring the social as well as the manipulated factors for the crime to involve the selected accused innocently by the vested forces for their selfish reasons purposely.

In view of all this, the General Assembly very rightly also cast serious doubts over the death penalty’s supposed deterrent effect on criminality and highlighted the danger of errors in the application of capital punishment and the obviously irreparable consequences of such mistakes which, as modern forensic methods have repeatedly exposed, do occur even in countries with sophisticated investigative and legal systems.

It is also proper further to stress the point by the Amnesty International that no fewer than 133 countries have abolished the death penalty in law or practice. And the trend continues to grow. 

The Sikh Vichar Manch submits with a great hope that India shall also soon become a champion of human rights along with other countries by abolishment of   the death penalty in practice as well as in law and taking the other necessary, adequate and meaningful steps required for one of the true democratic and welfare States of the World.

By

Balbir Singh Sooch, Advocate, Ludhiana;
Chief and Spokesperson
Sikh Vichar Manch
December 22, 2007

www.sikhvicharmanch.com

Courtesy by: The Hindu

The U.N. vote on the death penalty
Louise Arbour
 

The U.N. has taken a significant step towards abolition of the abhorrent practice  

This week, when it called for a world-wide moratorium on the application of the death penalty, the United Nations General Assembly took a significant step towards the definitive abolition of that sanction, thereby enhancing the protection of human rights and the inviolability of the person. The General Assembly also cast serious doubts over the death penalty’s supposed deterrent effect on criminality. Moreover, it highlighted the danger of errors in the application o f capital punishment and the obviously irreparable consequences of such mistakes which, as modern forensic methods have repeatedly exposed, do occur even in countries with sophisticated investigative and legal systems.

This sentiment finds echoes in every region of the world. According to Amnesty International, no fewer than 133 countries have abolished the death penalty in law or practice. And the trend continues to grow. Last July, Rwanda, a country that has suffered the ultimate crime of genocide and whose people’s thirst for justice is still far from quenched, has decided to forego the ultimate sanction of capital punishment. In so doing, Rwanda has given a powerful endorsement of the importance of pursuing justice while repudiating violence to attain it.

Despite these developments and despite the fact that a small group of countries reportedly accounted for 91 per cent of the executions in 2006 — namely China, Iran, Iraq, Pakistan, Sudan, and the United States — the death penalty is still practised in too many places. Regrettably, some states that had effectively applied a moratorium on executions, such as Afghanistan in the past three years, have recently resumed them.

The death penalty must always be regarded as an extreme exception to the fundamental right to life — which is protected under international law — and must as such be interpreted in the most restrictive manner. Accordingly, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights lists specific restrictions to its imposition. In particular, it states that capital punishment may be meted out only in the face of the most serious crimes and only after a trial and appeal proceedings that scrupulously respected all the principles of due process. In addition, the death penalty should always be administered in accordance with laws in force at the time of the commission of the crime. Minors and pregnant women must be spared. Human rights mechanisms have also clarified that capital punishment can neither be mandatory, nor can it be carried out in secret. Moreover, the methods of execution must meet standards of least possible physical and mental suffering.

All too often, however, the death penalty is applied in ways that violate international norms, such as the prohibition of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, as well as anti-discrimination standards.

Disproportionate application

This is the case, for example, in Iran with regard to the reported executions of people who were minors when the alleged crime was committed, or the stoning of offenders. Japan has recently executed an individual as old as 75 and, most worryingly, practises executions in secret and without forewarning to the persons to be executed and their families. Studies show that the death penalty is applied disproportionately to poor people in any given society. Vulnerable groups, such as migrant workers, as well as racial, ethnic or other unpopular minorities, are also often at risk.

It is therefore encouraging that higher courts, as well as legislatures, in some retentionist states are reviewing the methods and scope of capital punishment. For example, the U.S. Supreme Court has barred execution of minors and is re-examining the use of lethal injection.

At the State level this month, New Jersey abolished the death penalty thereby becoming the first American State to do so in more than 40 years. In China, a review by the Supreme People’s Court has reportedly led to some reduction in the high rate of executions. In Iran, the judiciary has ordered a moratorium on stoning, although this needs to be consistently enforced.

For its part, the U.N. has long advocated abolition of the death penalty or, at a minimum and in the interim, restrictions on its use, including moratoria. Such principled position is reflected in U.N. practice as well.

Thus, the statutes of the International Criminal Tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and for Rwanda, both established by the Security Council, do not provide for capital punishment. The International Criminal Court and U.N.-supported mixed tribunals have adopted a similar stance.

If the General Assembly’s call for a global moratorium is an additional and crucial stepping stone in the natural progression towards abolishing the death penalty altogether, the heart of the matter now and in the future remains in the actual implementation of this literally vital pledge.

Ultimately, it is through example that retentionist states may be persuaded to join the consensus and abandon the abhorrent practice of capital punishment. — Courtesy: U.N. Information Centre, New Delhi.
(Louise Arbour is U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights.)

Printer friendly page  
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail

 
Books
Cry for Justice
Letters
Human Rights
  Poetry  
     
  Links  
     
  All Headlines  
     
     
 
Index  |  Home  |  Panjabi Section  |  Author  |  Founder  |  Feedback  |  Links

Copyright © Balbir Singh Sooch, Chief and Spokesperson, Sikh Vichar Manch, Ludhana, Punjab (India)